Close category search window
 

Multicast-based mobility: a novel architecture for efficient micromobility

Full text access may be available

To access full text, please use your member or institutional sign in.


This paper appears in:
Selected Areas in Communications, IEEE Journal on
Date of Publication: May 2004
Author(s): Helmy, A.A.-G.
Dept. of Electr. Eng., Univ. of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Jaseemuddin, M. ;  Bhaskara, G.
Volume: 22 , Issue: 4
Page(s): 677 - 690
Product Type: Journals & Magazines

Available Formats Non-Member Price Member Price
US$31.00 US$10.00
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for the item!
  • Email
  • Print
  • Rights And Permissions

Abstract

Handover performance is very important when evaluating IP mobility protocols. If not performed efficiently, handover delays, jitters, and packet loss directly impact application performance. We propose a new architecture for providing efficient handover, while being able to coexist with other protocols. We propose a paradigm for multicast-based micromobility (M&M), where a visiting mobile is assigned a multicast address to use while moving within a domain. The multicast address is obtained using algorithmic mapping, and handover is achieved using multicast join/prune mechanisms. This paper outlines a framework for the design and evaluation of micromobility protocols. We define a suite of protocols (called candidate access router set) to enable multiple-access routers to receive traffic for the mobile node. By changing the number of such routers, timing, and buffering parameters, the protocol may be fine-tuned for specific technologies (e.g., 802.11) and handover scenarios. Extensive NS-2 simulations are used to compare M&M with other micromobility schemes-cellular Internet protocol (CIP) and handoff-aware wireless access Internet infrastructure (HAWAII). For proactive handover scenarios, our results show that M&M and CIP show lower handover delay and packet reordering than HAWAII. M&M, however, handles multiple border routers in a domain, where CIP fails. Also, for scenarios of reactive handover and coverage gaps M&M clearly outperforms CIP and HAWAII.

Index Terms

Index Terms are available to subscribers and IEEE members.

 





Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A non-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2012 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.