By Topic

A field study of two online dry-out methods for power transformers

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

5 Author(s)
Lelekakis, N. ; Centre for Power Transformer Monitoring, Diagnostics & Life Manage., Monash Univ., Clayton, VIC, Australia ; Martin, D. ; Wenyu Guo ; Wijaya, J.
more authors

Dry-out methods for transformers, using cellulose cartridges and molecular sieves, were compared. The latter are preferable for keeping a dry transformer dry, whereas the former are more efficient in drying a wet transformer. In this article, we compare the effectiveness of the cellulose cartridge filter and molecular sieve methods. Two identical transformers with similar insulation wetness were used. We estimated the water content of the paper (WCP) insulation from (1) the water activity of the oil, (2) the dielectric response of the transformer, and (3) the water content of individual paper samples determined by Karl Fischer titration. We also measured the acid number of the oil, its interfacial tension, dielectric strength, furan content, dissolved gas content, and particle count.

Published in:

Electrical Insulation Magazine, IEEE  (Volume:28 ,  Issue: 3 )