By Topic

Quantitative assessment of 2D versus 3D visualisation modalities

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

5 Author(s)
Ting, S. ; Dept. of Comput., Curtin Univ., Perth, WA, Australia ; Tan, T. ; West, G. ; Squelch, A.
more authors

Despite the growth of stereoscopic technology, there has been very little research done into the quantitative benefits of 3D over 2D visualisation systems. This study seeks to quantify and compare the human brain's response to 2D versus 3D images using EEG technology, in particular focusing on the trend in changes between the p300 response resulting from 2D and 3D stimulus sequences using the oddball paradigm. It was found that the p300 response to the 3D stimuli degraded at a faster rate than the 2D stimuli as target spotting task difficulty was raised.

Published in:

Visual Communications and Image Processing (VCIP), 2011 IEEE

Date of Conference:

6-9 Nov. 2011