Home  |   Login  |   Logout  |   Access Information  |   Alerts  |   Purchase History  |   Cart  |   Sitemap  |   Help   
 
Abstract
BROWSE SEARCH IEEE XPLORE GUIDE SUPPORT
arrow_leftView TOC   |arrow_leftPrevious Article   |  Next Articlearrow_right
Email/Printer Friendly Format  
 

Physically clustered forward body biasing for variability compensation in nanometer CMOS design
Sathanur, A.   Pullini, A.   Benini, L.   De Micheli, G.   Macii, E.  
Politec. di Torino, Turin, Italy;

This paper appears in: Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition, 2009. DATE '09.
Publication Date: 20-24 April 2009
On page(s): 154-159
Location: Nice,
ISSN: 1530-1591
ISBN: 978-1-4244-3781-8
INSPEC Accession Number: 10757813
Current Version Published: 2009-06-23

Abstract
Nanometer CMOS scaling has resulted in greatly increased circuit variability, with extremely adverse consequences on design predictability and yield. A number of recent works have focused on adaptive post-fabrication tuning approaches to mitigate this problem. Adaptive Body Bias (ABB) is one of the most successful tuning ldquoknobsrdquo in use today in high-performance custom design. Through forward body bias (FBB), the threshold voltage of the CMOS devices can be reduced after fabrication to bring the slow dies back to within the range of acceptable specs. FBB is usually applied with a very coarse core-level granularity at the price of a significantly increased leakage power. In this paper, we propose a novel, physically clustered FBB scheme on row-based standard-cell layout style that enables selective forward body biasing of only of the rows that contain most timing critical gates, thereby reducing leakage power overhead. We propose exact and heuristic algorithms to partition the design and allocate optimal body bias voltages to achieve minimum leakage power overhead. This style is fully compatible with state-of-the-art commercial physical design flows and imposes minimal area blowup. Benchmark results show large leakage power savings with a maximum savings of 30% in case of 5% compensation and 47.6% in case of 10% compensation with respect to block-level FBB and minimal implementation area overhead.

Index Terms
Available to subscribers and IEEE members.

References
Available to subscribers and IEEE members.
Citing Documents
Available to subscribers and IEEE members.
You are not logged in.
Guests may access Abstract records free of charge.
Login
Username
Password
» Forgot your password?
Please remember to log out when you have finished your session.
You must log in to access:
• Advanced or Author Search
• CrossRef Search
• AbstractPlus Records
• Full Text PDF
• Full Text HTML
Access this document
Full Text: PDF (240 KB)
» Buy this document now
»  Learn more about
»  Learn more about
    purchasing articles
    and standards

Rights and Permissions
» Learn More
Download this citation
Available to subscribers and IEEE members.
 
arrow_leftView TOC   |arrow_leftPrevious Article   |  Next Articlearrow_right   |  Back to toparrow_up
Indexed by IEE Inspec
© Copyright 2009 IEEE – All Rights Reserved