Home  |   Login  |   Logout  |   Access Information  |   Alerts  |   Purchase History  |   Cart  |   Sitemap  |   Help   
 
Abstract
BROWSE SEARCH IEEE XPLORE GUIDE SUPPORT
arrow_leftView TOC
Email/Printer Friendly Format  
 

Optimal edge detection using expansion matching and restoration
Raghunath Rao, K.   Ben-Arie, J.  
Dept. of Electr. & Comput. Eng., Illinois Inst. of Technol., Chicago, IL;

This paper appears in: Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on
Publication Date: Dec 1994
Volume: 16,  Issue: 12
On page(s): 1169-1182
ISSN: 0162-8828
References Cited: 24
CODEN: ITPIDJ
INSPEC Accession Number: 4871841
Digital Object Identifier: 10.1109/34.387490
Current Version Published: 2002-08-06

Abstract
Discusses the application of a newly developed expansion matching method for edge detection. Expansion matching optimizes a novel matching criterion called the discriminative signal-to-noise ratio (DSNR) and has been shown to robustly recognize templates under conditions of noise, severe occlusion and superposition. The DSNR criterion is better suited to evaluate matching in practical conditions than the traditional SNR since it considers as “noise” even the off-center response of the filter to the template itself. We introduce a family of optimal DSNR edge detectors based on the expansion filter for several edge models. For step edges, the optimal DSNR step expansion filter (SEF) is compared with the widely used Canny edge detector (CED). Experimental comparisons show that our edge detector yields better performance than the CED in terms of DSNR even under very adverse noise conditions. As for boundary detection, the SEF consistently yields higher figures of merit than the CED on a synthetic binary image over a wide range of noise levels. Results also show that the design parameters of size or width of the SEF are less critical than the CED variance. This means that a single scale of the SEF spans a larger range of input noise than a single scale of the CED. Experiments on a noisy image reveal that the SEF yields less noisy edge elements and preserves structural details more accurately. On the other hand, the CED output has better suppression of multiple responses than the corresponding SEF output

Index Terms
Available to subscribers and IEEE members.

References
Available to subscribers and IEEE members.
Citing Documents
Available to subscribers and IEEE members.
You are not logged in.
Guests may access Abstract records free of charge.
Login
Username
Password
» Forgot your password?
Please remember to log out when you have finished your session.
You must log in to access:
• Advanced or Author Search
• CrossRef Search
• AbstractPlus Records
• Full Text PDF
• Full Text HTML
Access this document
Full Text: PDF (1152 KB)
» Buy this document now
»  Learn more about
»  Learn more about
    purchasing articles
    and standards

Rights and Permissions
» Learn More
Download this citation
Available to subscribers and IEEE members.
 
arrow_leftView TOC   |  Back to toparrow_up
Indexed by IEE Inspec
© Copyright 2009 IEEE – All Rights Reserved