Home  |   Login  |   Logout  |   Access Information  |   Alerts  |   Purchase History  |   Cart  |   Sitemap  |   Help   
 
Abstract
BROWSE SEARCH IEEE XPLORE GUIDE SUPPORT
arrow_leftView TOC
Email/Printer Friendly Format  
 

Learning affinity functions for image segmentation: combining patch-based and gradient-based approaches
Fowlkes, C.   Martin, D.   Malik, J.  
Dept. of Electr. Eng. & Comput. Sci., California Univ., Berkeley, CA, USA;

This paper appears in: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2003. Proceedings. 2003 IEEE Computer Society Conference on
Publication Date: 18-20 June 2003
Volume: 2,  On page(s): II- 54-61 vol.2
ISSN: 1063-6919
ISBN: 0-7695-1900-8
INSPEC Accession Number: 7792751
Digital Object Identifier: 10.1109/CVPR.2003.1211452
Current Version Published: 2003-07-15

Abstract
The paper studies the problem of combining region and boundary cues for natural image segmentation. We employ a large database of manually segmented images in order to learn an optimal affinity function between pairs of pixels. These pairwise affinities can then be used to cluster the pixels into visually coherent groups. Region cues are computed as the similarity in brightness, color, and texture between image patches. Boundary cues are incorporated by looking for the presence of an "intervening contour", a large gradient along a straight line connecting two pixels. We first use the dataset of human segmentations to individually optimize parameters of the patch and gradient features for brightness, color, and texture cues. We then quantitatively measure the power of different feature combinations by computing the precision and recall of classifiers trained using those features. The mutual information between the output of the classifiers and the same-segment indicator function provides an alternative evaluation technique that yields identical conclusions. As expected, the best classifier makes use of brightness, color, and texture features, in both patch and gradient forms. We find that for brightness, the gradient cue outperforms the patch similarity. In contrast, using color patch similarity yields better results than using color gradients. Texture is the most powerful of the three channels, with both patches and gradients carrying significant independent information. Interestingly, the proximity of the two pixels does not add any information beyond that provided by the similarity cues. We also find that the convexity assumptions made by the intervening contour approach are supported by the ecological statistics of the dataset.

Index Terms
Available to subscribers and IEEE members.

References
Available to subscribers and IEEE members.
Citing Documents
Available to subscribers and IEEE members.
You are not logged in.
Guests may access Abstract records free of charge.
Login
Username
Password
» Forgot your password?
Please remember to log out when you have finished your session.
You must log in to access:
• Advanced or Author Search
• CrossRef Search
• AbstractPlus Records
• Full Text PDF
• Full Text HTML
Access this document
Full Text: PDF (1149 KB)
» Buy this document now
»  Learn more about
»  Learn more about
    purchasing articles
    and standards

Rights and Permissions
» Learn More
Download this citation
Available to subscribers and IEEE members.
 
arrow_leftView TOC   |  Back to toparrow_up
Indexed by IEE Inspec
© Copyright 2009 IEEE – All Rights Reserved