By Topic

Practical issues in the use of ABFT and a new failure model

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)
Silva, J.G. ; Dept. de Engenharia Inf., Coimbra Univ., Portugal ; Prata, P. ; Rela, M. ; Madeira, H.

We study the behavior of algorithm based fault tolerance (ABFT) techniques under faults injected according to a quite general fault model. Besides the problem of roundoff error in floating point arithmetic we identify two further weakpoints, namely lack of protection of data during input and output, and incorrect execution of the correctness checks. We propose the robust ABFT technique to handle those weakpoints. We then generalize it to programs that use assertions, where similar problems arise, leading to the technique of robust assertions, whose effectiveness is shown by fault injection experiments on a realistic control application. With this technique a system follows a new failure model, that we call fail-bounded, where with high probability all results produced are either correct or, if wrong, they are within a certain bound of the correct value, whose exact value depends on the output assertions used. We claim that this failure model is very useful to describe the behavior of many low redundancy systems.

Published in:

Fault-Tolerant Computing, 1998. Digest of Papers. Twenty-Eighth Annual International Symposium on

Date of Conference:

23-25 June 1998