By Topic

Comparative study of the PML and C-COM mesh-truncation techniques

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
O. M. Ramahi ; Digital Equipment Corp., Maynard, MA, USA ; J. B. Schneider

The recently developed concurrent complementary operators method (C-COM) for mesh truncation of finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) problems has been shown to produce a substantial improvement in differential equation-based absorbing boundary conditions (ABCs). In this letter, the C-COM and the perfectly matched layer (PML) approaches are compared using two-dimensional problems. Two representative geometries are considered that address the absorption of evanescent waves and waves traveling at near-grazing incidence. It is found that the C-COM yields significant improvements over the PML solution for these geometries

Published in:

IEEE Microwave and Guided Wave Letters  (Volume:8 ,  Issue: 2 )