By Topic

Can a “poor” verification system be a “good” identification system? A preliminary study

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)

The matching accuracy of a biometric system is typically quantified through measures such as the False Match Rate (FMR), False Non-match Rate (FNMR), Equal Error Rate (EER), Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve and Cumulative Match Characteristic (CMC) curve. In this work, we analyze the relationship between the ROC and CMC curves, which are two measures commonly used to describe the performance of verification and identification systems, respectively. We establish that it is possible for a biometric system to exhibit “good” verification performance and “poor” identification performance (and vice versa) by demonstrating the conditions required to produce such outcomes. Experimental analysis using synthetically generated match scores confirms our hypothesis that the ROC or CMC alone cannot completely characterize biometric system performance.

Published in:

Information Forensics and Security (WIFS), 2012 IEEE International Workshop on

Date of Conference:

2-5 Dec. 2012