By Topic

Two-Port Network Models for Compliant Rhomboidal Strain Amplifiers

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Joshua Schultz ; George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, USA ; Jun Ueda

Piezoelectric stack actuators have the advantages of zero backlash and no acoustic noise, but their stroke is too small to actuate robotic links directly. Because the force available is often more than the required, the stroke of the piezoelectric stack can be amplified by a compliant mechanism at the expense of force. It is not always clear what the geometry of this compliant mechanism should be. Compliant mechanisms have parallels in biology in that they describe two-way interactions between the actuator and the environment. In this paper, we employ the concept of a two-port network model from circuit theory to describe this two-way interaction and present a method to obtain each element of the two-port model as an analytical function of physical geometric parameters for a wide class of geometries. This method makes use of Castigliano's theorem and Euler-Bernoulli linearly elastic beam theory. To our knowledge, this is the first two-port representation of a compliant mechanism that is based on analytical expressions of geometric parameters. This analytical model agrees well with finite-element method calculations. We also examine a representative case experimentally and achieve accuracies better than 18%.

Published in:

IEEE Transactions on Robotics  (Volume:29 ,  Issue: 1 )