By Topic

Comparison of isotropic dry etching process using XeF2 and ANisotropic Wet Etching Process using EDP for microhotplate device

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Tardan, Z. ; Sch. of Electr. & Electron. Eng., USM, Nibong Tebal, Malaysia ; Halim, Z.A.

This paper discusses the difference between isotropic dry etching process using XeF2 and anisotropic wet etching process using Ethyl Diamine Pyrocathecol (EDP). The process is a bulk-etch process necessary for obtaining a suspended structure in a microhotplate device. For the dry etching process using XeF2, the pressure of the nitrogen gas is fixed to 0 Torr, while the pressure of XeF2 is fixed to 2.5Torr. Wet etching process using EDP is conducted in a fume cupboard with 75 ml ethylene diamine, 12 g pyrocathecol, and 10 ml water. Results show that both of these processes are suitable for a microhotplate device. However, there are some differences between the wet and dry etching processes that have to be considered when etching a microhotplate device. The differences in terms of surface condition, time to obtain the suspended structure, and etch rate for each etching process are discussed in detail in this paper.

Published in:

Quality Electronic Design (ASQED), 2011 3rd Asia Symposium on

Date of Conference:

19-20 July 2011