By Topic

Fixed- and Floating-Point Processor Comparison for MIMO-OFDM Detector

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)
Janhunen, J. ; Centre for Wireless Commun., Univ. of Oulu, Oulu, Finland ; Pitkanen, T. ; Silven, O. ; Juntti, M.

The evolution toward software-defined radio (SDR) technologies, in particular, cognitive radios, is leading toward the need to support multiple radio solutions with the same baseband processing resources. This implies not only a huge design effort, but also a shift from hardware to software design flavored tool chains. In this paper, a hardware complexity and energy dissipation are analyzed by implementing three programmable processor architectures that support 32- and 12-bit floating-point and 16-bit fixed-point arithmetics. The processors are based on the transport triggered architecture (TTA) that has a very low programmability overhead. We programmed a recently introduced selective spanning with fast enumeration (SSFE) soft-output detector for these processors. The processors are capable to achieve data rates required in multiple-input multiple-output orthogonal frequency- division multiplexing (MIMO-OFDM) 3G LTE system with a small energy dissipation. The analysis shows that at the same goodput rate a floating-point implementation can achieve a lower gate count and a better power efficiency than a fixed-point design. Combined with tool chain benefits, the floating-point arithmetic is becoming attractive for future SDR solutions.

Published in:

Selected Topics in Signal Processing, IEEE Journal of  (Volume:5 ,  Issue: 8 )