By Topic

Benefits of implicit redundant representation genetic algorithms for conceptual design and damage identification

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Raich, A. ; Dept. of Civil & Environ. Eng., Lafayette Coll., Easton, PA, USA ; Fritz, K.

Solving large-scale structural design and damage identification problems using genetic algorithm optimization methods requires the use of advanced representations. The flexible implicit redundant representation (IRR) provides significant benefits for inverse problems in which the solution involves determining the optimal number of design variables, in addition to their values. The IRR encodes both variables and redundant segments in each individual. The encoded variable locations and values dynamically change and self-organize through crossover and mutation during optimization. In searching for optimal structural forms in conceptual design, the IRR provides the flexibility to represent designs having different numbers and locations of members and nodes, which supports the simultaneous optimization of topology, geometry, and member sizes. Therefore a broad range of designs can be evaluated during a single trial. The set of Pareto-optimal designs evolved by the IRR define the tradeoffs that occur in optimizing the objectives as the structural topology and geometry changes. In damage detection, optimization is often used to predict the location and extent of damages based on the structural response collected from measurement data. The IRR can work with a small subset of all possible damaged elements during the search process, which allows the method to scale well with problem size. The IRR genetic algorithm representation discussed holds significant promise in solving large-scale inverse problems by providing the benefit of working with a variable number of design variables. This flexibility is leveraged to reduce the implicit size of the problem domain searched and to compare designs having markedly different forms or topologies.

Published in:

Evolutionary Computation (CEC), 2011 IEEE Congress on

Date of Conference:

5-8 June 2011