By Topic

Fine-Grained Power and Body-Bias Control for Near-Threshold Deep Sub-Micron CMOS Circuits

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Kakoee, M.R. ; Dept. of Electron., Comput. Sci. & Syst., Univ. of Bologna, Bologna, Italy ; Benini, L.

Lowering supply voltage is still the most effective technique to reduce dynamic power, and Vdd is being pushed toward the threshold voltage for ultra-low power applications. However, near-threshold circuit leakage power is comparable to switching power and performance is highly sensitive to static and dynamic threshold voltage variations. This makes designing circuits for a target performance very difficult, and post-silicon tunability is required to achieve performance targets without taking huge design margins. Post-silicon tuning of voltage supply and body bias in active mode, together with power gating for idle leakage power minimization are being investigated to tackle variability challenges in near-threshold operation. In this paper, we review and put in perspective techniques recently proposed in the literature for fine-grained post-silicon tuning and power gating. These techniques leverage the typical row-based ASIC layout style and use the row as the atomic element for circuit clustering. The results of row-based power gating on a set of benchmark circuits show that the leakage savings can be achieved are, superior to those obtained using existing power-gating solutions and with much tighter timing and area constraints. Benchmark results on row-based forward body biasing show large leakage power savings with a maximum savings of 61% in case of 18% compensation in 45 nm and 93% in case of 10% compensation in 32 nm with respect to block-level approaches. Finally, row-based dual-Vdd can provide post-silicon speed compensation in near-threshold region up-to 45% while achieving more than 50% lower power compared to single-Vdd.

Published in:

Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems, IEEE Journal on  (Volume:1 ,  Issue: 2 )