By Topic

Comparison of three electrical capacitance tomography systems

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Dixiang Chen ; School of Mechatronics Engineering and Automation, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China ; Wuqiang Yang ; Xiang Deng

Electrical capacitance tomography (ECT) has been developed for two decades to visualize the internal behavior of industrial processes containing dielectric components. Three different ECT systems have been developed: (1) based on a charge/discharge capacitance measuring circuit, (2) based on an AC circuit and (3) based on an impedance analyzer. In this paper the operation principles, calibration methods and some performance of the three systems are compared. The experimental results prove that the AC-based ECT system is superior to the charge/discharge ECT system. Although the impedance analyzer based ECT system can provide the highest accuracy and the best image quality, it is bulky and expensive.

Published in:

2010 IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques

Date of Conference:

1-2 July 2010