By Topic

Evaluation of Aerial Remote Sensing Techniques for Vegetation Management in Power-Line Corridors

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

7 Author(s)
Steven J. Mills ; Australian Research Centre for Aerospace Automation, Queensland University of Technology , Brisbane, Australia ; Marcos P. Gerardo Castro ; Zhengrong Li ; Jinhai Cai
more authors

This paper presents an evaluation of airborne sensors for use in vegetation management in power-line corridors. Three integral stages in the management process are addressed, including the detection of trees, relative positioning with respect to the nearest power line, and vegetation height estimation. Image data, including multispectral and high resolution, are analyzed along with LiDAR data captured from fixed-wing aircraft. Ground truth data are then used to establish the accuracy and reliability of each sensor, thus providing a quantitative comparison of sensor options. Tree detection was achieved through crown delineation using a pulse-coupled neural network and morphologic reconstruction applied to multispectral imagery. Through testing, it was shown to achieve a detection rate of 96%, while the accuracy in segmenting groups of trees and single trees correctly was shown to be 75%. Relative positioning using LiDAR achieved root-mean-square-error (rmse) values of 1.4 and 2.1 m for cross-track distance and along-track position, respectively, while direct georeferencing achieved rmse of 3.1 m in both instances. The estimation of pole and tree heights measured with LiDAR had rmse values of 0.4 and 0.9 m, respectively, while stereo matching achieved 1.5 and 2.9 m. Overall, a small number of poles were missed with detection rates of 98% and 95% for LiDAR and stereo matching.

Published in:

IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing  (Volume:48 ,  Issue: 9 )