By Topic

Multiple-Layer Adaptation of HUT Snow Emission Model: Comparison With Experimental Data

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

6 Author(s)
Lemmetyinen, J. ; Arctic Res. Center, Finnish Meteorol. Inst., Sodankyla, Finland ; Pulliainen, Jouni ; Rees, A. ; Kontu, A.
more authors

Modeling of snow emission at microwave frequencies is necessary in order to understand the complex relations between the emitted brightness temperature and snowpack characteristics such as density, grain size, moisture content, and vertical structure. Several empirical, semiempirical, and purely theoretical models for the prediction of snow emission properties have been developed in recent years. In this paper, we investigate the capability of one such model to simulate snow emission during the peak snow season-a new multilayer version of the Helsinki University of Technology (HUT) snow model. Developed with a single layer, the original HUT model was easily applied over large geographic areas for the estimation of snow cover characteristics by model inversion. A single homogenous layer, however, may not accurately allow the simulation of vertically structured natural snowpacks. The new modification to the model allows the simulation of emission from a snowpack with several snow or ice layers, with the individual component layers treated as in the original HUT model. The results of modeled snowpack emission, using both the original model and the new multilayer modification, are compared with reference measurements made using ground-based radiometers deployed in Finland and Canada. Detailed in situ measurements of the snowpack are used to set the model inputs. We show that, in most cases, use of the multiple-layer model improves estimates for the higher frequencies tested, with up to 38% improvement in rms error. In some cases, however, the use of the multiple-layer model weakens model performance particularly at lower frequencies.

Published in:

Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:48 ,  Issue: 7 )