By Topic

Comparison of geometrical, kinematic, and dynamic performance of several potential field methods

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)

The artificial potential field (APF) approach is a widely used path-planning algorithm for robot navigation. The method in some of its variants is known to exhibit several difficulties such as entrapment in a local minimum. In this paper, we compare the behavior of several variants of APF methods with emphasis on the quality of path geometry, and velocity and acceleration profiles. We argue that great improvement results when globally consistent potential fields (such as distance to the target) are used in conjunction with boundary following algorithm.

Published in:

IEEE Southeastcon 2009

Date of Conference:

5-8 March 2009