Close category search window
 

Mask material effects in cryogenic deep reactive ion etching

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $31
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Sainiemi, L. ; Micro and Nanosciences Laboratory, Helsinki University of Technology, P.O. Box 3500, FIN 02015 HUT, Espoo, Finland ; Franssila, S.

Your organization might have access to this article on the publisher's site. To check, click on this link:http://dx.doi.org/+10.1116/1.2734157 

Cryogenic silicon etching in inductively coupled SF6/O2 plasma has been studied, especially the behavior of mask materials. Suitability of eight different mask materials for cryogenic silicon deep reactive ion etching has been investigated. Three of the five photoresists suffered from cracking during cryogenic etching. We clarified the stages of the etching process and identified two mechanisms behind the cracking: thermal expansion mismatch and mechanical deformation from wafer clamping and backside helium pressure. Also thickness of the photoresist plays a role in cracking, but, contrary to common conception that all thick resists suffer from cracking in cryogenic etching, we found that SU-8 negative resist did not crack, even for very thick layers. This is explained to be due to its high cross-linking density. All three hard mask materials had high selectivities and were free of cracking problems. However, aluminum mask resulted in poor surface quality, while thermally grown SiO2 and amorphous Al2O3 deposited by atomic layer deposition showed smooth surfaces and sidewalls. Silicon dioxide had selectivity of 150:1, while Al2O3 selectivity was 66 000:1. This extreme selectivity of Al2O3 mask, combined with good surface quality, is shown to be highly beneficial in both shallow and through-wafer etching.

Published in:
Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B: Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures  (Volume:25 ,  Issue: 3 )

Date of Publication: May 2007

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2013 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.