By Topic

Modeling high power magnetron copper seed deposition: Effect of feature geometry on coverage

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $31
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Stout, Phillip J. ; Motorola, 3501 Ed Bluestein Boulevard, MD K10, Austin, Texas 78721 ; Da Zhang ; Ventzek, Peter L.G.

Your organization might have access to this article on the publisher's site. To check, click on this link:http://dx.doi.org/+10.1116/1.1562178 

The deposition of copper using a high power magnetron (HPM) has been studied using reactor and feature scale models. Discussed are results for Cu seed HPM deposition on trench, via, and dual inlaid features with different geometries (aspect ratio and side wall angles). At low wafer powers the Cu seed feature coverage is characterized by geometric shadowing due to the broad angular distribution of the dominant Cu athermal. At high wafer powers the metal deposited at feature bottom is sputtered by Ar+ and redistributed to the side walls. The deposition rate within a feature is nonlinear with time as metal deposited at the feature opening obstructs incoming metal from reaching the inside of the feature. Competing trends of higher copper flux at wafer center versus edge and higher Ar+ flux at wafer center versus edge result in a transition of the field thickness heights from edge≫center at low wafer powers to center≪edge at high wafer powers. The type and geometry of a feature in which metal is being deposited plays a major role in the final metal coverage. Vias have less coverage than trenches given the smaller opening for incoming metal to enter. For instance trenches with aspect ratio (AR) equal to 4 still have more Cu side wall coverage than vias of AR=1. In the dual inlaid geometry studied the via inner side wall and trench bottom corners are the most difficult regions to deposit a Cu seed. Both side wall angle and AR can have equal control of a thickness change. For instance in a via a similar side wall thickness decrease (at low wafer power) can be achieved with AR=4 and θvia=4°–0° or AR=1–4 and θ<- - inf>via=4°. © 2003 American Vacuum Society.

Published in:

Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films  (Volume:21 ,  Issue: 3 )