Cart (Loading....) | Create Account
Close category search window
 

Effects of wall contamination on consecutive plasma processes

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $31
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

5 Author(s)
Yasuda, H.K. ; Surface Science and Plasma Technology Center and Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri 65211 ; Yu, Q.S. ; Reddy, C.M. ; Moffitt, C.E.
more authors

Your organization might have access to this article on the publisher's site. To check, click on this link:http://dx.doi.org/+10.1116/1.1372902 

Plasma processes often go beyond the primary objectives focused on the substrate, or targeted materials. For instance, sputtered materials deposit on surfaces other than the substrate, and plasma deposition extends to the walls of the reactor. In the process of plasma polymerization, or plasma chemical vapor deposition (PCVD), every surface (not just the substrate surface) participates in the overall plasma deposition process. Consequently the chemical and physical natures of all surfaces within a reactor are very important factors that determine the fate of the PCVD process. The materials deposited on the wall surface (wall contaminants) are created in the previous run in a batch operation of PCVD. In a sequential plasma process, where plasma polymerization of trimethylsilane (TMS) was followed by plasma polymerization of hexafluoroethane (HFE), F-containing oligomers (low molecular weight compounds), created during the plasma polymerization of HFE in the previous run, remain on surfaces in the reactor. The wall contaminants were found to migrate to the new substrate (aluminum alloy) surface in the subsequent run upon the evacuation of the reactor. If an O2 plasma treatment is applied, F-containing organic compounds chemisorbed on the new substrate surface are converted to F-containing inorganic compounds, which decreases the plasma-ablatable F on the surface. If no O2 plasma treatment is applied, the F-containing organic compounds are exposed to the environment of the TMS plasma. From the viewpoint of the sequence of plasma processes, a new HFE/TMS sequence is created without the O2 plasma treatment. The HFE/TMS system (reversed order to the normal cycle) causes adhesion failure at the interface between the plasma polymers and the aluminum alloys, whereas the TMS/HFE system yields good a- - dhesion of plasma deposited layers to the substrate and provides superior adhesion of a primer applied on the plasma polymer coating. This difference was created by the difference in handling of the wall contaminants. © 2001 American Vacuum Society.

Published in:

Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films  (Volume:19 ,  Issue: 5 )

Date of Publication:

Sep 2001

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2014 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.