Close category search window
 

Defect characterisation and reduction on a multi-chamber inter layer dielectric (ILD) tool

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Prendergast, B. ; Intel Ireland Ltd., Ireland ; Hudson, P.

Due to the decreasing geometry and increased production complexity in the Semiconductor industry, particle defects have become more critical in regard to wafer yield parameters. Current cleanroom technology success leads to contamination being attributed mainly to equipment operation. One of the key mechanisms is wearout of equipment parts. This paper discusses the techniques applied at Fab 10, Intel's European Semiconductor Manufacturing site and the success of correlating machine components wearout to metrology measurements. In 1 micron technology days, one could visually inspect machine components during preventive maintenance and make a "judgment call" on replacement. However, risks are too great in sub-micron technology where a flake from a worn-out part can cost several die and contaminate downstream tools. In an effort to put more science into the changeout frequency of parts, removing subjectivity, a Noran 'Voyager 2100' Microanalysis system on an Amray 2030L FESEM was used to collect and analyze the X-rays from both defects on blank oxide wafers and machine parts. A background baseline of new multi-chamber ILD Chemical Vapour Deposition (CVD) machines was initially performed, which corresponded to normal station monitor defect counts. When defect monitors on a particular machine trend upwards, further monitors were performed. In tandem, a basic description of machine components was obtained from the vendor for approved materials. Where we did not have specific composition of suspect parts, the suspect part would be changed out and another Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDX) monitor performed. We were able to obtain spectra of submicron defects on blanket oxide wafers which were held in a catalog and compared to analysis results of machine parts such as o-ring wearout of chamber doors, showerhead wearout and quality of graphite components. The information allowed us to set realistic changeout frequency of parts before they became a problem. The EDX analysis was backed up by inline metrology measurements on product. The success of this led to EDX on a new inline system being the standard test before the ILD process tool was vented up for troubleshooting. From the spectra information library, a response flow checklist (RFC) was written, which - is now used as a standard method of troubleshooting Out Of Control (OOCs) particle situations. This is also the standard test performed when upgrades/new parts are being qualified in our tools.

Published in:
Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference and Workshop, 1995. ASMC 95 Proceedings. IEEE/SEMI 1995

Date of Conference: 13-15 Nov 1995

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2013 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.