By Topic

Covariance Statistics of Polarimetric Brightness Temperature Measurements

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Jinzheng Peng ; Space Phys. Res. Lab., Michigan Univ., Ann Arbor, MI ; Ruf, C.S.

All microwave radiometer measurements of brightness temperature (T B) include an additive noise component. With conventional linearly polarized radiometers, the variance of the noise is a well-understood function of the system temperature, the predetection bandwidth, and the integration time according to the so-called ldquoradiometer uncertainty equation.rdquo The noise has generally been considered to be uncorrelated between orthogonally polarized channels. The variance and the correlation statistics of the additive noise component of fully polarimetric radiometer measurements are derived from theoretical considerations, and the resulting relationships are experimentally verified. It is found that the noise can be correlated between polarimetric channels, and the correlation statistics will vary as a function of the polarization state of the scene under observation. For example, a strong correlation is typical between the noise in either vertically or horizontally polarized TB and the 45 deg slant linear polarizations that are often used to derive the third Stokes T B. A weak, but nonzero, correlation is also possible between the additive noise in the vertically and horizontally polarized T B's themselves. This is a correction to the common assumption that they are uncorrelated.

Published in:

Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:46 ,  Issue: 10 )