By Topic

Coherence- and Amplitude-Based Analysis of Seismogenic Damage in Bam, Iran, Using ENVISAT ASAR Data

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)
Gustavo A. Arciniegas ; Dept. of Earth Obs. Sci., Int. Inst. for Geo-Inf. Sci. & Earth Obs., Enschede ; Wietske Bijker ; Norman Kerle ; Valentyn A. Tolpekin

The sensitivity of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) and interferometric SAR (InSAR) to surface properties, especially changes in height and roughness, combined with an all-weather capability, makes radar remote sensing a potential tool for mapping urban damage caused by earthquakes. With InSAR, surface displacement has been mapped successfully and in detail, but for urban-damage mapping, results have so far been less conclusive. ENVISAT Advanced SAR images of Bam, Iran, that were acquired before and after the 2003 earthquake were used. Between preseismic and coseismic image pairs, coherence decreased with increasing damage levels. However, contrary to previous studies, earthquake damage caused both increases and decreases in amplitude. Therefore, its absolute value, which correlated with damage level, was used. Individually, coherence difference led to better results than absolute amplitude change, although still with limited accuracy. The combination of both resulted in an overall accuracy of 52%. Since vegetation causes decorrelation, a predisaster Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer image was used to mask out vegetated areas, which improved the accuracy by 4%. The ground-truth map showed damage levels per district instead of per pixel. Therefore, the ratio of pixels classified as "damage" and "nondamage" was calculated for each damage class of the map, and a clear relation was found. This shows that the aggregation level of the map partly explains the low-accuracy figures of the pixel-based evaluation. Although improvement was made, InSAR techniques for urban-damage mapping do not yet provide the accuracy levels needed for disaster mitigation. However, substantial improvements can be expected from instruments with higher spatial resolution, such as the recently launched Phased Array type L-band SAR and Terra SAR-X

Published in:

IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing  (Volume:45 ,  Issue: 6 )