By Topic

μComplexity: estimating processor design effort

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Bazeghi, C. ; Dept. of Comput. Eng., California Univ., Santa Cruz, CA, USA ; Mesa-Martinez, F.J. ; Renau, J.

Microprocessor design complexity is growing rapidly. As a result, current development costs for top of the line processors are staggering, and are doubling every 4 years. As we design ever larger and more complex processors, it is becoming increasingly difficult to estimate how much time it will take to design and verify them. To compound this problem, processor design cost estimation still does not have a quantitative approach. Although designing a processor is very resource consuming, there is little work measuring, understanding, and estimating the effort required. To address this problem, this paper introduces μComplexity, a methodology to measure and estimate processor design effort. μComplexity consists of three main parts, namely a procedure to account for the contributions of the different components in the design, accurate statistical regression of experimental measures using a nonlinear mixed-effects model, and a productivity adjustment to account for the productivities of different teams. We use μComplexity to evaluate a series of design effort estimators on several processor designs. Our analysis shows that the number of lines of HDL code, the sum of the fan-ins of the logic cones in the design, and a linear combination of the two metrics are good design effort estimators. On the other hand, power, area, frequency, number of flip-flops, and number of standard cells are poor estimators of design effort. We also show that productivity adjustments are necessary to produce accurate estimations.

Published in:

Microarchitecture, 2005. MICRO-38. Proceedings. 38th Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on

Date of Conference:

12-16 Nov. 2005