Close category search window
 

Lazy inference on object identities in wireless sensor networks

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)
Jaewon Shin ; Dept. of Electr. Eng., Stanford Univ., CA, USA ; Lee, N. ; Thrun, S. ; Guibas, L.

Maintaining the identities of moving objects is an important aspect of most multi-object tracking applications. Uncertainty in sensor data, coupled with the intrinsic combinatorial difficulty of the data association problem, suggests probabilistic formulations over the set of possible identities. While an explicit representation of a distribution over all associations may require exponential storage and computation, in practice the information provided by this distribution is accessed only in certain stylized ways, as when asking for the identity of a given track, or the track with a given identity. Exploiting this observation, we proposed a practical solution to this problem based on maintaining marginal probabilities and demonstrated its effectiveness in the context of tracking within a wireless sensor network. That method, unfortunately, requires extensive communication in the network whenever new identity observations are made, in order for normalization operations to keep the marginals consistent. In this paper, we have proposed a very different solution based on accumulated log-likelihoods that can postpone all normalization computations until actual identity queries are made. In this manner the continuous communication and computational expense of repeated normalizations is avoided and that effort is expended only when actual queries are made of the network. We compare the two methods in terms of their computational complexities, inference accuracies, and distributed implementations. Simulation and experimental results from a RFID system are also presented.

Published in:
Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2005. IPSN 2005. Fourth International Symposium on

Date of Conference: 15 April 2005

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2013 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.