Close category search window
 

Code compression techniques using operand field remapping

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $31
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Lin, K. ; Dept. of Comput. Sci. & Inf. Eng., Nat. Chiao Tung Univ., Hsinchu, Taiwan ; Chung, C.P.

Dictionary-based code compression stores the most frequently used instruction sequences in a dictionary and replaces the occurrences of these sequences in the program with codewords. The large dictionary size is due mainly to many instruction sequences which are different only in their operands, but are otherwise the same. The operand factorisation technique divides the expression tree into a tree pattern (opcode sequence) and an operand pattern (operand sequence) to reduce this redundancy. Instruction sequences with the same opcodes but different operands may thus share the same tree-pattern dictionary entry. This paper proposes an operand field remapping method to further reduce the dictionary size. The key idea is to explore the relations between the current operand to be compressed with those already compressed. The operand pattern dictionary is therefore divided into an operand remapping dictionary and an operand list dictionary. Each entry in the operand remapping dictionary indicates whether the operand (register or immediate value) to be compressed is the most-used operand, the same as the destination register of the previous instructions, or otherwise. With this remapping technique, the operand dictionary size is greatly reduced. An average 46% compression ratio can be achieved, where the compression ratio = (dictionary size + compressed code size)/(original program size)

Published in:
Computers and Digital Techniques, IEE Proceedings -  (Volume:149 ,  Issue: 1 )

Date of Publication: Jan 2002

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2013 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.