Close category search window
 

Comparison of two microwave radiobrightness models and validation with field measurements

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)
Crosson, W.L. ; Global Hydrology & Climate Center, Universities Space Res. Assoc., Huntsville, AL, USA ; Laymon, C.A. ; Inguva, Ramarao ; Bowman, C.

This paper compares microwave brightness temperature (TB) estimated by two radiobrightness models: a multilayer coherent radiative transfer (CRT) model and a single-layer Fresnel reflectance model. Two dielectric mixing schemes were used along with the models to calculate permittivity (real part of the dielectric constant). Model TB and permittivity estimates were compared and validated against Huntsville, AL 1998 field experiment measurements. Model differences can be attributed to the mixing scheme, the radiobrightness model, or the vertical profile representation. Two sets of simulations were performed to quantify the sources of variation, one using observed son temperature and moisture profiles as input, and another using uniform profiles. Using uniform profiles, systematic differences in permittivity estimated by the mixing schemes resulted in TB differences as large as 15 K. However, for uniform profiles, differences in TB estimated by the radiobrightness models for a given permittivity value were less than 2 K. For cases using observed profiles, near-surface drying of the profiles resulted in TB values from the CRT model 6-10 K higher than estimates from the Fresnel model, which determines TB based on 0-5 cm mean moisture and temperature. Therefore, the major sources of TB variations were the dielectric mixing scheme and the shape of the near-surface moisture profile. No radiobrightness/mixing scheme combination exhibited superiority across all plots and times

Published in:
Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:40 ,  Issue: 1 )

Date of Publication: Jan 2002

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2013 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.