By Topic

A comparative worst-case error analysis of some proposed six-port designs

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
F. M. Ghannouchi ; Dept. de Genie Electr., Ecole Polytech. de Montreal, Que., Canada ; R. G. Bosisio

A detailed analysis of the accuracy in complex-reflection coefficient measurement by the six-port technique is discussed. The expression of the relative error in amplitude measurement of the complex reflection due to power-reading errors are derived in worst-case situation using both the basic six-port and sensitivity analysis theories. The precision of measurement of any point in the Smith chart is obtained by reference to lines of constant errors (amplitude and phase) drawn on the Smith chart for various proposed six-port correlators (junctions). A comparison of three proposed six-port designs shows that the Engens six-port design presents the best performance for a given power measurement accuracy. A maximum dynamic range of 60 dB seems to be a limit for six-port reflectometers using a good-quality power detector (α=0.1%)

Published in:

IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement  (Volume:37 ,  Issue: 4 )