By Topic

Modeling the economics of testing: a DFT perspective

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

5 Author(s)
Nag, P.K. ; Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA, USA ; Gattiker, A. ; Sichao Wei ; Blanton, R.D.
more authors

Decision-makers typically make test tradeoffs using models that mainly represent direct costs such as test generation time and tester use. Analyzing a test strategy's impact on other significant factors such as test quality and yield learning requires an understanding of the dynamic nature of the interdomain dependencies of test, manufacturing, and design. Our research centers on modeling the tradeoffs between these domains. To answer the DFT question, we developed the Carnegie Mellon University Test Cost Model, a DFT cost-benefit model, derived inputs to the model for various IC cases with different assumptions about volume, yield, chip size, test attributes, and so forth; and studied DFT's impact on these cases. We used the model to determine the domains for which DFT is beneficial and for which DFT should not be used. The model is a composite of simple cause-and-effect relationships derived from published research. It incorporates many factors affecting test cost, but we don't consider it a complete model. Our purpose is to illustrate the necessity of using such models in assessing the effectiveness of various test strategies

Published in:

Design & Test of Computers, IEEE  (Volume:19 ,  Issue: 1 )