By Topic

Comparison of some feature subset selection methods for use in remote sensing image analysis

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

1 Author(s)
P. C. Smits ; Space Applications Inst., Joint Res. Centre, Ispra, Italy

As feature subset selection constitutes an important aspect of data fusion in general, this paper compares different measures of goodness and their influence on the classification results. These measures are 1) Fukunaga's (1990) criterion, and 2) the ML criterion with a user-specified upper limit for the total error (Smits). Results are presented using publicly available multi-spectral/multi-sensor and hyperspectral images, and it is concluded that the ML criterion with a user-specified upper limit for the total error is a valid alternative to classical methods

Published in:

Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2001. IGARSS '01. IEEE 2001 International  (Volume:1 )

Date of Conference:

2001