By Topic

The distribution of target registration error in rigid-body point-based registration

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
J. M. Fitzpatrick ; Dept. of Electr. Eng. & Comput. Sci., Vanderbilt Univ., Nashville, TN, USA ; J. B. West

Guidance systems designed for neurosurgery, hip surgery, spine surgery and for approaches to other anatomy that is relatively rigid can use rigid-body transformations to accomplish image registration. These systems often rely on point-based registration to determine the transformation and many such systems use attached fiducial markers to establish accurate fiducial points for the registration, the points being established by some fiducial localization process. Accuracy is important to these systems, as is knowledge of the level of that accuracy. An advantage of marker-based systems, particularly those in which the markers are bone-implanted, is that registration error depends only on the fiducial localization and is, thus, to a large extent independent of the particular object being registered. Thus, it should be possible to predict the clinical accuracy of marker-based systems on the basis of experimental measurements made with phantoms or previous patients. For most registration tasks, the most important error measure is target registration error (TRE), which is the distance after registration between corresponding points not used in calculating the registration transform. Here, the authors derive an approximation to the distribution of TRE; this is an extension of previous work that gave the expected squared value of TRE. They show the distribution of the squared magnitude of TRE and that of the component of TRE in an arbitrary direction. Using numerical simulations, the authors show that their theoretical results are a close match to the simulated ones.

Published in:

IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging  (Volume:20 ,  Issue: 9 )