Close category search window
 

Compression of SAR raw data through range focusing and variable-rate trellis-coded quantization

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
D'Elia, C. ; Dipartimento di Ingegneria Elettronica, Naples Univ., Italy ; Poggi, G. ; Verdoliva, L.

There is an ever-growing interest in the compression of SAR data because of the huge resources required for storage and transmission. This is especially true for spaceborne sensors, given the limited capacity of the downlink channel. Unfortunately, SAR data lack the useful properties on which compression algorithms rely; indeed, these are present in the focused images, but focusing is too complex for on-board implementation at this time. Poggi et al. (2000) proposed to perform on the satellite only the low-complexity range focusing, which increases the data correlation and better concentrates their energy. These properties were then exploited by adopting a variable-rate vector quantizer, with a clear performance improvement with respect to reference techniques. However, vector quantization (VQ) is too complex for actual on-board implementation, and therefore, here we replace VQ with trellis-coded VQ. To limit complexity, only small vectors are used, which reduces VQ's ability to exploit data dependencies; on the other hand, trellis coding allows one to encode large blocks of data at once, and to obtain a better partition of the input space. Experiments on real SAR data show that the overall performance is comparable to that of Poggi et al., but the complexity is much lower, making on-board implementation possible

Published in:
Image Processing, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:10 ,  Issue: 9 )

Date of Publication: Sep 2001

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2013 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.