Close category search window
 

Comparison between analytical and numerical methods of calculating tooth ripple losses in salient pole synchronous machines

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Drubel, O. ; Inst. of Electr. Eng., Dortmund Univ., Germany ; Stoll, R.L.

The application of analytical and numerical methods to an electromagnetic problem requiring an accurate representation of saturation is examined. The problem considered is that of tooth-ripple losses in salient-pole synchronous machines for the situation where the pole pitch is much greater than the armature slot pitch so that the applied DC field can be taken as uniform. To calculate these losses, several analytical methods have been developed over a period of many years. Two such methods, one devised by Oberretl (1972) and a modified version of the considerably older one-dimensional approach of Gibbs (1947), are compared with results obtained from the finite-element and finite-difference methods. Using a time-stepping finite-difference calculation, the influence of moving boundaries and the imposed DC field are taken into account for the first time in this tooth-ripple calculation. A saturation factor is defined that allows the designer to calculate the tooth-ripple losses of solid salient-pole synchronous machines for a wide range of machine size taking magnetic saturation into account. To verify the theory, the results are compared with measurements on a small model. These measurements were done using a torque meter placed between the model and a DC drive motor and were cross-checked by the Poynting vector method. Rules and limits are given for the use of the analytical methods

Published in:
Energy Conversion, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:16 ,  Issue: 1 )

Date of Publication: Mar 2001

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2013 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.