Close category search window
 

Experimental verification of EGSnrc Monte Carlo calculated ion chamber response in low energy photon beams

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)

The EGSnrc Monte Carlo system was used to calculate response, defined as the ratio of the dose to the gas in the cavity and air kerma free-in-air at the center of the cavity, normalized at 60Co. Calculations of the response of a graphite cavity and Exradin A12 air-equivalent plastic chambers were compared with measurements using free-air ionization chambers. For the graphite chamber, the agreement between measured and calculated chamber response diverges up to 8% down to 50 kV. The authors simulated the high-Z contamination, distributed over the inner surface of the wall in the form of iron grains, by introducing an iron ring of 1 μm thickness covering 0.45% of the area on the inside wall. These amounts of high-Z contamination are perfectly conceivable considering the machining process of the graphite cavity. Assuming pure C552, for the Exradin A12 the agreement is within 0.5% down to 85 keV but gradually gets worse at lower energies. A mass spectroscopic analysis of C552 showed that the amount of impurities with Z between 10 and 82 amounts to 90 μg/g. The calculations with the full composition as resulting from the analysis show agreement within 0.4% down to 70 keV. Below that energy, deviations amount up to 3%. These can be explained by (1) impurities on the inside surface of the wall from the machining process as demonstrated from measurements on other chambers of the same type; (2) accuracy of the spectra used in the calculations; (3) geometrical details of the chamber such as the stem

Published in:
Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2000. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE  (Volume:4 )

Date of Conference: 2000

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2013 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.