Cart (Loading....) | Create Account
Close category search window
 

Evaluating attenuation correction in Ga-67 SPECT image reconstruction through numerical observer ROC and human observer LROC

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)
Gifford, H.C. ; Dept. of Radiol., Massachusetts Univ. Med. Center, Worcester, MA, USA ; Soares, E.J. ; Wells, R.G. ; King, M.A.

The channelized Hotelling observer (CHO) has correlated with human observers for many “signal-known-exactly” detection tasks. The authors have found that average CHO performances in SKE ROC studies, taken over multiple tumor locations, can be used to eliminate some suboptimal reconstruction strategies from consideration in human localization ROC (LROC) studies. Here, the authors have continued this line of research using a human LROC study that evaluated attenuation correction (AC) for OSEM and FBP reconstruction. The detection task was “hot” tumor detection in simulated Ga-67 scans of the chest, and 3 tumor activities were used. The projection data modeled attenuation and detector blur, but perfect scatter rejection was assumed. Images were obtained from 5 reconstruction strategies: OSEM with AC, OSEM without AC, FBP without AC, FBP with multiplicative Chang AC, and FBP with 1 iteration of iterative Chang AC. The OSEM strategies used 1 iteration with 8 subsets of 16 angular projections each. Results in the human observer LROC study were based on 200 images (100 tumor locations) per strategy, while the CHO was applied with 100 images at each of 50 tumor locations. In both studies, statistically significant differences (p=0.05) were found between OSEM with AC and the other 4 strategies, but no other significant differences between strategies were found. Future investigations will examine analytical methods of obtaining image statistics for the CHO in order to make application of the CHO more efficient

Published in:

Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2000. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE  (Volume:1 )

Date of Conference:

2000

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2014 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.