Cart (Loading....) | Create Account
Close category search window
 

Automatic design of both topology and tuning of a common parameterized controller for two families of plants using genetic programming

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Yu, J. ; Genetic Programming Inc., Los Altos, CA, USA ; Keane, Martin A. ; Koza, John R.

This paper demonstrates that a technique of evolutionary computation can be used to automatically create the design for both the topology and parameter values (tuning) for a common controller (containing various parameters representing the overall characteristics of the plant) for two families of plants. The automatically designed controller is created by means of genetic programming using a fitness measure that attempts to optimize step response and disturbance rejection while simultaneously imposing constraints on maximum sensitivity and sensor noise attenuation. The automatically designed controller outperforms the controller designed with conventional techniques. In particular, the automatically designed controller is superior to the Astrom and Hagglund controller (1995) for all plants of both families for the integral of the time-weighted absolute error (ITAE) for a step input, the ITAE for disturbance rejection, and maximum sensitivity. Averaged over all plants of both families, the ITAE for the step input for the automatically designed controller is only 58% of the value for the conventional controller; the ITAE for disturbance rejection is 91% of the value for the conventional controller; and the maximum sensitivity for the automatically designed controller is only 85% of the value for the conventional controller. The automatically designed controller is “general” in the sense that it contains free variables and therefore provides a solution to an entire category of problems (i.e., all the plants in the two families) not merely a single instance of the problem (i.e., a particular single plant)

Published in:

Computer-Aided Control System Design, 2000. CACSD 2000. IEEE International Symposium on

Date of Conference:

2000

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2014 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.