Close category search window
 

Delay analysis of an input buffered ATM switch under two different scheduling disciplines

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Seman, K. ; Fac. of Electr. Eng., Univ. Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia ; Waqas, M. ; Kai, E.T.

Depending on the buffer arrangement, space division ATM switch architectures are classified into three main categories: input buffered, output buffered and centrally buffered switches. Among them, input buffered ATM switch is the most simple, cheap and popular switch architecture but it exhibits limited throughput performance due to head of line blocking (HOL) conflict. This problem occurs because of the contention in the unscheduled arrival of ATM cells to the switch. A lot of effort has been expended in attempting to resolve this conflict but it is found that this HOL blocking still induces variable delays in ATM cells while transmitting them from input ports to output ports. This paper analyzes the delay distribution of these cell's waiting times that they may have to experience while being in the buffers at the inputs of the switch before transmission. So far researchers have concentrated only on the average and mean values of the cell's delays but the analysis of the delay distribution of cells gives complete information of switch behaviour and performance under different conditions such as different switch sizes, switch loadings etc. For this purpose we have developed a simulation model under two different cell-scheduling policies (random and polling). To obtain the interested study parameters such as probability mass function and cumulative distribution function of each cell's delay, we have simulated the model for different switch sizes and input loads. It can be revealed from the comparison results that the switch exhibits better performance under the random selection policy as compared to the polling selection technique

Published in:
TENCON 2000. Proceedings  (Volume:3 )

Date of Conference: 2000

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2013 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.