Cart (Loading....) | Create Account
Close category search window
 

Confidence assessment of quality prediction from process measurement in sequential manufacturing processes

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Ye, N. ; Dept. of Ind. Eng., Arizona State Univ., Tempe, AZ, USA ; Qiu Zhong ; Rahn, G.E.

Sequential manufacturing processes are common in many manufacturing industries. We can use an artificial neural network (ANN) technique to build a model of manufacturing processes to capture the relationship between process measures and production unit quality. Using the ANN model, the quality value of a production unit can be predicted for its process measures. In addition to the predicted quality value, we need to assess our confidence in the predicted quality value through a confidence interval (prediction interval). Little work exists to assess the confidence in ANN outputs. This paper presents a comparative study of several methods in assessing the confidence in ANN outputs for quality prediction. We investigate two new methods: the variance estimation method and the distribution estimation method, in comparison with two existing methods: the error estimation method and the linear regression method. With respect to prediction accuracy and power, our results show that the distribution estimation method appears very promising among the four methods. However, the distribution estimation method requires much computation and storage during training and prediction, which may create difficulty in real-time quality monitoring and control. For the consideration of computation and storage requirement, the variance estimation method provides an acceptable solution. The error estimation method produces the worst performance among the four methods

Published in:

Electronics Packaging Manufacturing, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:23 ,  Issue: 3 )

Date of Publication:

Jul 2000

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2014 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.