Scheduled System Maintenance:
On Monday, April 27th, IEEE Xplore will undergo scheduled maintenance from 1:00 PM - 3:00 PM ET (17:00 - 19:00 UTC). No interruption in service is anticipated.
By Topic

Cursive handwriting recognition using hidden Markov models and a lexicon-driven level building algorithm

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $31
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
Procter, S. ; Sch. of Electron. Eng., Surrey Univ., Guildford, UK ; Illingworth, J. ; Mokhtarian, E.

The authors describe a method for the recognition of cursively handwritten words using hidden Markov models (HMMs). The modelling methodology used has previously been successfully applied to the recognition of both degraded machine-printed text and hand-printed numerals. A novel lexicon-driven level building (LDLB) algorithm is proposed, which incorporates a lexicon directly within the search procedure and maintains a list of plausible match sequences at each stage of the search, rather than decoding using only the most likely state sequence. A word recognition rate of 93.4% is achieved using a 713 word lexicon, compared to just 49.8% when the same lexicon is used to post-process the results produced by a standard level building algorithm. Various procedures are described for the normalisation of cursive script. Results are presented on a single-author database of scanned text. It is shown how very high reliability, up to near perfect recognition, can be achieved by using a threshold to reject those word hypotheses to which the system assigns a low confidence. At 19% rejection, 99.2% of accepted words appeared in the top two choices produced by the system, and 100% of the 1645 accepted words were correctly recognised within the top eight choices

Published in:

Vision, Image and Signal Processing, IEE Proceedings -  (Volume:147 ,  Issue: 4 )