Cart (Loading....) | Create Account
Close category search window
 

Improving gamut mapping color constancy

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Finlayson, G. ; Sch. of Inf. Syst., East Anglia Univ., Norwich, UK ; Hordley, S.

The color constancy problem, that is, estimating the color of the scene illuminant from a set of image data recorded under an unknown light, is an important problem in computer vision and digital photography. The gamut mapping approach to color constancy is, to date, one of the most successful solutions to this problem. In this algorithm the set of mappings taking the image colors recorded under an unknown illuminant to the gamut of all colors observed under a standard illuminant is characterized. Then, at a second stage, a single mapping is selected from this feasible set. In the first version of this algorithm Forsyth (1990) mapped sensor values recorded under one illuminant to those recorded under a second, using a three-dimensional (3-D) diagonal matrix. However because the intensity of the scene illuminant cannot be recovered Finlayson (see IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. vol.18, no.10, p.1034-38, 1996) modified Forsyth's algorithm to work in a two-dimensional (2-D) chromaticity space and set out to recover only 2-D chromaticity mappings. While the chromaticity mapping overcomes the intensity problem it is not clear that something has not been lost in the process. The first result of this paper is to show that only intensity information is lost. Formally, we prove that the feasible set calculated by Forsyth's original algorithm, projected into 2-D, is the same as the feasible set calculated by the 2-D algorithm. Thus, there is no advantage in using the 3-D algorithm and we can use the simpler, 2-D version of the algorithm to characterize the set of feasible illuminants. Another problem with the chromaticity mapping is that it is perspective in nature and so chromaticities and chromaticity maps are perspectively distorted. Previous work demonstrated that the effects of perspective distortion were serious for the 2-D algorithm. Indeed, in order to select a sensible single mapping from the feasible set this set must first be mapped back up to 3-D. We extend this work to the case where a constraint on the possible color of the illuminant is factored into the gamut mapping algorithm. We show here that the illumination constraint can be enforced during selection without explicitly intersecting the two constraint sets. In the final part of this paper we reappraise the selection task. Gamut mapping returns the set of feasible illuminant maps. Our new algorithm is tested using real and synthetic images. The results of these tests show that the algorithm presented delivers excellent color constancy

Published in:

Image Processing, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:9 ,  Issue: 10 )

Date of Publication:

Oct 2000

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2014 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.