By Topic

Experiments in the use of multiple-choice examinations for electromagnetics-related topics

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

1 Author(s)
Excell, P.S. ; Dept. of Electron. Imaging & Media Commun., Bradford Univ., UK

The results of experimental usages of multiple-choice examinations for topics in electromagnetic compatibility, basic electromagnetics, and optics are reported. A novel technique to prevent students from gaining marks by random answers, the “stupid answer” method, was tested in one of the experiments and found to give good results. It was found that the mark distributions were comparable with those achieved by the same groups of students in traditional examinations and there appeared to be a good correlation with the abilities of the students, as measured in the traditional way. Fears that the examination would be too superficial and that students would easily score high marks proved groundless. It is suggested that, although the method has the possible disadvantage that it is not possible to pursue a problem in depth, it has several advantages, in particular in being able to cover the whole of the syllabus. When marked by computer, the method is inherently anonymous. A dramatic saving in the number of skilled person-hours required for marking was effected and there is also a potential for a significant saving in the number of person-hours required for the setting of questions

Published in:

Education, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:43 ,  Issue: 3 )