By Topic

RD-optimization of hierarchical structured adaptive vector quantization for video coding

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Wagner, M. ; Freiburg Univ., Germany ; Saupe, D.

Summary form only given. This poster contains two contributions to very-low-bitrate video coding. First, we show that in contrast to common practice incremental techniques for rate-distortion optimization such as the generalized BFOS algorithm may clearly outperform the standard technique based on Lagrangian multipliers. This is relevant in cases where the computation of RD points has a low complexity. An implementation independent performance measure is used for comparison and run-time experiments are provided. Second, we report on recent progress of our ongoing research evaluating the prospects of adaptive vector quantization (AVQ) for very-low-bitrate video coding. In contrast to conventional state-of-the-art video coding based on entropy coding of motion compensated residual frames in the frequency domain, adaptive vector quantization offers the potential to adapt its codebooks to the changing statistics of image sequences. The basic building blocks of our current AVQ video codec are: (1) block-based coding in the wavelet domain where wavelet coefficients correspond to (overlapping) spatial regions; (2) hierarchical organization of the wavelet coefficients using quadtree structures; (3) three way coding mode decision for each block (block replenishment, product code vector quantization, new VQ block with codebook update); and (4) rigorous rate/distortion optimization for all coding choices (image partition and block coding mode). This video codec does not apply motion compensation, however. A comparison with standard transform coding (H.263) shows that in spite of the improvements of our coder over previously published AVQ video coders it still shows a performance gap of about 1 dB for some test sequences

Published in:

Data Compression Conference, 2000. Proceedings. DCC 2000

Date of Conference:

2000