By Topic

Construction risk assessment by linguistics: authors' reply to comments by J.M. Gleason

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Kangari, R. ; Sch. of Civil Eng., Georgia Inst. of Technol., Atlanta, GA, USA ; Riggs, L.S.

In replying to J.M. Gleason's comments (see ibid., vol.38, no.2 p.177-8, 1991) the authors admit that an initial error in calculation of the example that affected subsequent calculations was made in the original paper (see ibid., vol.36, no.2, May 1989). The corrected equations are presented. Taking into account the corrections, it is concluded that among the three predefined fuzzy sets, the set `high' has the closest Euclidean distance to the fuzzy set [S]. Therefore the total risk of this project is `high'

Published in:

Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:38 ,  Issue: 3 )