Cart (Loading....) | Create Account
Close category search window

Effects of sample geometry and electrode configuration on measured electrical resistivity of skeletal muscle

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Kun, Stevan ; Dept. of Biomed. Eng., Worcester Polytech. Inst., MA, USA ; Peura, R.

Over the past 40 years, researchers from a variety of scientific backgrounds have been using Rush's equations to analyze results of their electrophysiological studies. A lack of understanding of the constraints and the domain in which these equations are valid, often results in situations in which it is challenging to evaluate and compare results obtained by different investigators. Here, the authors reanalyzed the conditions for which Rush's equations were derived, and using mathematical modeling, computer simulation and in vitro measurements, they delineated areas of their appropriate application. The authors' studies showed that both sample geometry and test electrode configuration affect the measured tissue electrical resistivities: (1) The sample can be considered semi-infinite only if its dimensions are >50 inter-electrode separation distances (IESD), and thickness >2.5 IESD, (2) smaller sample sizes increase the transversally measured resistivity, (3) semi-infinite samples thinner than 2.5 IESD, and samples tested with needle electrodes demonstrate reduced anisotropy, and (4) when surface-spot electrodes are longitudinally aligned, as the IESD/tissue thickness ratio decreases, the measured resistivity increases. The authors' conclusion is that in most experimental situations, it is necessary to use modeling techniques to decouple the electrode configuration/sample geometry influence from the measured tissue resistivity.

Published in:

Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:47 ,  Issue: 2 )

Date of Publication:

Feb. 2000

Need Help?

IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2014 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.