By Topic

Validation of new Gibbs priors for Bayesian tomographic reconstruction using numerical studies and physically acquired data

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

3 Author(s)
S. J. Lee ; Dept. of Electron. Eng., Paichai Univ., Taejon, South Korea ; Y. Choi ; G. Gindi

The variety of Bayesian MAP approaches to emission tomography proposed in recent years can both stabilize reconstructions and lead to improved bias and variance. In the authors' previous work (S.J. Lee et al., IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. MI-14, no. 4, p. 669-80, 1995; S.J. Lee et al., IEEE Trans. Nuclear Science, vol. NS-44, no. 3, p. 1381-7, 1997), the authors showed that the thin-plate (TP) prior, which is less sensitive to variations in first spatial derivatives than the conventional membrane (MM) prior, yields improved reconstructions in the sense of low bias. In spite of the several advantages of such quadratic smoothing priors, they are still less than ideal due to their limitations in edge preservation. Here, the authors use a convex but nonquadratic (CNQ) potential function, which provides a degree of edge preservation. As in the case of quadratic priors, a class of two-dimensional smoothing splines with first and second partial derivatives are applied to the new potential function. In order to reduce difficulties such as oversmoothing for MM and edge overshooting for TP, the authors also generalize the prior energy definition to that of a linear combination of MM and TP using a control parameter, and observe its transition between the two extreme cases. To validate advantages of their new priors, the authors first perform extensive numerical studies using a digital phantom to compare the bias/variance behavior of CNQ priors with that of quadratic priors. They also use physically acquired PET emission and transmission data from phantoms to observe the efficacies of their new priors. The authors' numerical studies and results using physical phantoms show that a combination of first and second partial derivatives applied to the CNQ potential yields improved quantitative results in terms of scalar metrics of image quality computed from independent noise trials and good qualitative results for both emission and transmission images.

Published in:

IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science  (Volume:46 ,  Issue: 6 )