By Topic

Logging and recovery in adaptive software distributed shared memory systems

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Kongmunvattana, A. ; Center for Adv. Comput. Studies, Univ. of Southwestern Louisiana, Lafayette, LA, USA ; Nian-Feng Tzeng

Software distributed shared memory (DSM) improves the programmability of message-passing machines and workstation clusters by providing a shared memory abstract (i.e., a coherent global address space) to programmers. As in any distributed system, however; the probability of software DSM failures increases as the system size grows. This paper presents a new efficient logging protocol for adaptive software DSM (ADSM), called adaptive logging (AL). It is suitable for both coordinated and independent checkpointing since it speeds up the recovery process and eliminates the unbounded rollback problem associated with independent checkpointing. By leveraging the existing coherence data maintained by ADSM, our AL protocol adapts to log only unrecoverable data (which cannot be recreated or retrieved after a failure) necessary for correct recovery, reducing both the number of messages logged and the amount of logged data. We have performed experiments on a cluster of eight Sun Ultra-5 workstations, comparing our AL protocol against the previous message logging (ML) protocol by implementing both protocols in TreadMarks-based ADSM. The experimental results show that our AL protocol consistently outperforms the ML protocol: Our protocol increases the execution time slightly by 2% to 10% during failure-free execution, while the ML protocol lengthens the execution time by many folds due to its larger log size and higher number of messages logged. Our AL-based recovery also outperforms ML-based recovery by 9% to 17% under parallel application examined

Published in:

Reliable Distributed Systems, 1999. Proceedings of the 18th IEEE Symposium on

Date of Conference:

1999