By Topic

Performance comparison of three identification methods for the analysis of electromechanical oscillations

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$33 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
J. J. Sanchez-Gasca ; Power Syst. Energy Consult., GE Power Syst., Schenectady, NY, USA ; J. H. Chow

This paper describes the results of a study to evaluate the performance of three identification methods for the study of low frequency electromechanical oscillations. The three identification methods considered are: the Steiglitz-McBride algorithm; the eigensystem realization algorithm; and the Prony method. The identification methods are used to identify low order linear systems of power systems modeled in standard transient stability programs. This is accomplished by processing the system response to a simple probing pulse. The frequency domain characteristics of several identified systems are compared using three power systems with lightly damped electromechanical modes

Published in:

IEEE Transactions on Power Systems  (Volume:14 ,  Issue: 3 )