Cart (Loading....) | Create Account
Close category search window
 

A multidisciplinary flight control development environment and its application to a helicopter

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

4 Author(s)
Tischler, M.B. ; NASA Ames Res. Center, Moffett Field, CA ; Colbourne, J.D. ; Morel, M.R. ; Biezad, D.J.

CONDUIT, a computational facility for aircraft flight control design and evaluation, has been developed and demonstrated. CONDUIT offers a graphical environment for integrating simulation models and control law architectures with design specifications and constraints. This tool provides comprehensive analysis support and design guidance to a knowledgeable control system designer. Combining the easy-to-use graphical interface, the preprogrammed libraries of specifications, and the multiobjective function optimization engine (CONSOL-OPTCAD) in a single environment, CONDUIT offers the potential for significant reduction in time and cost of design, analysis, and flight-test optimization of modern flight control systems. A case study application to a complex rotary-wing flight control problem was presented. The baseline RASCAL UH-60 control system, as provided by the flight control contractor, was evaluated versus the ADS-33D handling-quality specifications. The selectable system gains were optimized to meet all system performance and handling-quality specifications. CONDUIT successfully exploited the tradeoff between forward loop and feedback dynamics to significantly improve the expected handling qualities and stability robustness, while reducing crossover frequency and minimizing actuator activity. The tradeoff studies showed the effect of increasing design margin (overdesign) on closed loop performance and actuator activity. Design margins exceeding 7.5% led to rapidly increasing actuator energy and saturation, resulting in shortened fatigue life of rotor control

Published in:

Control Systems, IEEE  (Volume:19 ,  Issue: 4 )

Date of Publication:

Aug 1999

Need Help?


IEEE Advancing Technology for Humanity About IEEE Xplore | Contact | Help | Terms of Use | Nondiscrimination Policy | Site Map | Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology.
© Copyright 2014 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.