By Topic

Comparison of three radiative transfer model inversion techniques to estimate canopy biophysical variables from remote sensing data

Sign In

Cookies must be enabled to login.After enabling cookies , please use refresh or reload or ctrl+f5 on the browser for the login options.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

6 Author(s)
Pragnere, A. ; INRA Bioclimatologie, Avignon, France ; Baret, F. ; Weiss, M. ; Myneni, R.
more authors

The objective of this study was to compare three model inversion techniques (neural networks (NNT), look up tables (LUT), iterative optimization (OPT)) for the estimation of four main biophysical variables: LAI, Cab, fcover and fPAR. The canopy radiative transfer model used is SAIL coupled with PROSPECT leaf model. Results show that OPT performs better when applied to datasets consistent with the radiative transfer model assumptions used in the inversion approach. Conversely, NNT shows significant improvement when applied to different datasets. The authors observed also large differences in the retrieval performances between the biophysical variables investigated, fPAR and fcover being better estimated than LAI and Cab

Published in:

Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 1999. IGARSS '99 Proceedings. IEEE 1999 International  (Volume:2 )

Date of Conference:

1999